Algae Bead Module: Lessons, Projects, and Experiments
Experiments: Algae Beads
General NGSS Projects for Photosynthesis, Respiration, and Algal Physiology
Aligned for NGSS Standards:
HS-LS1-5 |
Use a model to illustrate how photosynthesis transforms light energy into stored chemical energy. |
HS-LS1-6 |
Construct and revise an explanation based on evidence for how carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen from sugar molecules may combine with other elements to form amino acids and/or other large carbon-based molecules. |
HS-LS1-7 |
Use a model to illustrate that cellular respiration is a chemical process whereby the bonds of food molecules and oxygen molecules are broken and the bonds in new compounds are formed resulting in a net transfer of energy. |
HS-LS2-5 |
Develop a model to illustrate the role of photosynthesis and cellular respiration in the cycling of carbon among the biosphere, atmosphere, hydrosphere, and geosphere. |
HS-PS1-5 |
Apply scientific principles and evidence to provide an explanation about the effects of changing the temperature or concentration of the reacting particles on the rate at which a reaction occurs. |
HS-PS1-6 |
Refine the design of a chemical system by specifying a change in conditions that would produce increased amounts of products at equilibrium. |
HS-LS4-4 |
Construct an explanation based on evidence for how natural selection leads to adaptation of populations. |
Copyright 2020 by Algae Research and Supply, Inc. Carlsbad CA. All rights reserved.
Algae Research and Supply, Inc.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Project Summary: This experiment aims to test the effects of surface area to volume ratio (SA:V) on rates of algal photosynthesis. Students will be comparing smashed algae beads to whole algae beads to confirm the relationship between SA:V and efficient uptake. Although we are not technically altering the shape of the algal cells themselves, the alginate bead facilitates the transfer of carbon dioxide and carbonate to the encased cells. Altering the SA:V of the beads is linked to the resident algae's resulting productivity within the beads.
Time Estimates: 45 minutes (depending on time intervals)
Learning Outcomes:
Classroom Prep: Divide class into lab groups if desired. See the materials list for the required components
Videos:
Vocabulary: Surface Area to Volume ratio |
Background
Large organisms like mammals and other vertebrates have a specialized orifice to consume their energy choice, be it grass or meat. This mouth is the most efficient way to consume food for these larger lifeforms. As we zoom into the microbial world, however, other methods begin to appear. The most obvious is diffusion through the membrane constituting the cell itself. This transport's efficiency is mediated by the organisms' Surface Area: Volume ratio (SA:V). In this case, the surface area describes the amount of membrane available for transport, and the volume describes the cavity in which items are transported.
As an organism's SA:V increases, the efficiency with which an organism can transport products through its membrane increases. This flows logically, as there is more area available to transport items into a relatively smaller cavity. There are many ways that an organism can increase its SA:V. The easiest is just being smaller overall, as little spherical bacteria are more efficient at transporting products than a larger spherical eukaryote. If being small is not an option, you can fold your membrane into ridges that do not affect your overall volume but increase your surface area. This effect is in play in the human intestinal tract, with ridges called villi and microvilli providing more surface area to uptake digested nutrients than a comparable smooth surface.
This experiment aims to test the effects of variable SA:V on rates of algal photosynthesis. Students will be comparing smashed algae beads to whole algae beads to confirm the relationship between SA:V and efficient uptake. Although we are not technically altering the shape of the algal cells themselves, the alginate bead facilitates the transfer of carbon dioxide and carbonate to the encased cells. Altering the SA:V of the beads is linked to the resident algae's resulting productivity within the beads.
Materials
Tips and Considerations
Procedure
Worksheet
Hypothesis: Based on the smashed and unsmashed beads’ surface area calculations, which do you think will be most photosynthetically efficient? Why?
Variables: Variables: What is our independent (manipulated) variable? Which is our dependent (responding) variable? Which variables are controlled across treatments? Respond below.
Data
UNSMASHED |
|||||||
Sample # |
Surface area |
Mass |
pH at T=0’ |
pH at Time =
|
pH at Time = |
pH at Time = |
pH at Time = |
1 |
|||||||
2 |
|||||||
3 |
SMASHED |
|||||||
Sample # |
Surface area |
Mass |
pH at T=0’ |
pH at Time =
|
pH at Time = |
pH at Time = |
pH at Time = |
1 |
|||||||
2 |
|||||||
3 |
Below graph the pH of each tube over time.
Analysis/Conclusion
Based on your data, what differences are there in the rate of photosynthesis between the two types of beads?
Restate your hypothesis. Was your hypothesis correct? Which treatment (smashed or unsmashed) resulted in the highest levels of photosynthesis? Does this conform with the SA:V theory? Why or why not?
CER Rubric
Check your work! |
||
Claim – a conclusion that answers the original question |
|
|
Evidence – scientific data that supports the claim |
|
|
Reasoning – a justification that links the claim and evidence |
|
|
Project Summary: The goal of this experiment is to determine the optimal temperature for effective algal photosynthesis. To do this, you will be exposing algae to various temperatures and recording the rate of photosynthesis resulting from these treatments.
Time Estimates: 45 minutes (depending on time intervals)
Learning Outcomes:
Classroom Prep: Divide class into lab groups if desired. See the materials list for the required components
Videos:
Vocabulary: kinetics, denature, |
Background
It is fairly evident from our life experience that temperature can be a significant factor in a biological response. Consider, for instance, how much harder it is to run a mile without warming up in a snowstorm vs. doing the same on a warm, pleasant day. These effects are similar in single-celled organisms like algae. The science behind these effects is called kinetics.
Chemical reactions have an optimal temperature at which they will perform most effectively. This is because most cells’ reactions are mediated by enzymes: proteins that lower the amount of energy necessary to complete them. These proteins can lose effectiveness and denature (or unravel themselves) when temperatures get too high, or freeze up and stick when the temperature gets too low. If you’ve ever cooked an egg, the reason that the contents of the shell change color and consistency are due to the denaturation of proteins. Fevers in mammals can be dangerous when they get too high because their enzymes begin malfunctioning and denaturing.
Most, if not all, photosynthesis steps are mediated by enzymes, which like all others, have an optimal temperature. The goal of this experiment is to determine the optimal temperature for effective algal photosynthesis. To do this, you will be exposing algae to various temperatures and recording photosynthetic responses resulting from these treatments.
Materials
Tips and Considerations
Procedure
Worksheet
Hypothesis: Make a prediction. At what temperature do you expect photosynthesis to cease completely? At what temperature do you expect photosynthesis to do the best?
Theoretically, do you think these inhibitory temperatures would be different if we were to use different algae species in our algae beads? Why or why not?
Variables: What is our independent (manipulated) variable? Which is our dependent (responding) variable? Which variables are controlled across treatments? Respond below.
Data
Tube |
Temp (°C) |
Light Intensity (eV) |
pH at T=0’ |
pH at Time = |
pH at Time = |
pH at Time = |
pH at Time = |
pH at Time = |
T1 |
||||||||
T2 |
||||||||
T3 |
||||||||
T4 |
||||||||
T5 |
Below graph the data for each tube over time.
Analysis/Conclusion
Based on your data, How did each treatment affect photosynthesis?
Restate your hypothesis, was your prediction correct? Based on your data, does temperature affect photosynthesis? Why or why not?
Extending Questions
Do you think these effects would occur at different temperatures with different species? Why or why not?
Do some research on polar vs tropical microalgae. What are some similarities and differences?
CER Rubric
Check your work! |
||
Claim – a conclusion that answers the original question |
|
|
Evidence – scientific data that supports the claim |
|
|
Reasoning – a justification that links the claim and evidence |
|
|
Project Summary: The goal of this experiment is to perform a fundamental spectral analysis of the photopigments possessed by Chlorella vulgaris, the algae encased within our alginate beads. In a laboratory, this is achieved with a variety of highly complicated and expensive machines. In this experiment, we will be using chromatography paper or a coffee filter, which executes roughly the same function. We will split the solution of various pigments into the component wavelengths that they absorb, which will serve to break them apart from each other so that we can make educated guesses about which molecules C. vulgaris uses to harvest light.
Time Estimates:
Learning Outcomes:
Classroom Prep: Divide class into lab groups if desired. See the materials list for the required components
Videos:
Vocabulary: Photopigment, isomerize, spectral analysis |
Background
Photopigments “isomerize,” or change shape, when a photon of light strikes the structure. The specific structure of each photopigment discriminates the wavelength of light that forces this isomerization. This same concept is in play in our eyes’ cones, with three types of photopigments undergoing isomerization to indicate impingement of various wavelengths of light. Mammalian color blindness is due to the loss or relative low presence of one or more of these photopigments.
In algae, varying photopigments’ structure amounts to a molecular arms race allowing more efficient harvesting of light in advantageous conditions. Take, for example, the structure of divinyl chlorophyll a (DV-chl-a) versus divinyl chlorophyll b (DV-chl-b), shown[1]. As we can see, the only change in structure occurs in the top right corner, with DV-Chl-a lacking the double-bonded oxygen possessed by DV-Chl b. This simple change captures blue light better than red light and allows the cyanobacterium that possesses DC-Chl b to live at deeper depths when red light has disappeared through water and only blue light remains.
The goal of this experiment is to perform a fundamental spectral analysis of the photopigments possessed by Chlorella vulgaris, the algae encased within our alginate beads. In a laboratory, this is achieved with a variety of highly complicated and expensive machines. In this experiment, we will be using chromatography paper or a coffee filter, which executes roughly the same function. We will split the solution of various pigments into the component wavelengths that they absorb, which will serve to break them apart from each other so that we can make educated guesses about which molecules C. vulgaris uses to harvest light.
Materials
Tips and Considerations
Procedure
Pigment extraction:
Chromatography:
Chlorophyll-b - olive green
Chlorophyll-a - blue green faint yellow / orange
Carotenes - faint orange/yellow
Xanthophylls - yellow
Image: (Top) Idealized chromatography paper layout with a green pigment spot approximately 2cm from the chromatography paper (coffee filter). The “x” marks the place where you will drop the solvent to drive the pigments apart. (Bottom) Idealized photopigment separation after solvent addition.
Worksheet
Hypothesis: Research the photopigment composition of Chlorella vulgaris. Using that information, make an educated guess about what the chromatography paper will look like upon separation.
Data
Algae Beads
Line / Pigment |
Distance from bottom |
Color observed |
Probable pigment |
Pigment location |
2.0cm from bottom |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
1. Closest to bottom |
|||
2. |
|||
3. |
|||
4. |
|||
5. Solvent frontline |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Terrestrial plant leaf
Line / Pigment |
Distance from bottom |
Color observed |
Probable pigment |
Pigment location |
2.0cm from bottom |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
1. Closest to bottom |
|||
2. |
|||
3. |
|||
4. |
|||
5. Solvent frontline |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Sketch your chromatograms, labeling the distance traveled from the origin as well as your assigned photopigment identity
Calculate the retention factor for each photopigment observed.
(Rf = distance pigment traveled ÷ distance solvent traveled)
Analysis/Conclusion
Why do some of the photopigments travel farther down the paper than others?
Were you able to successfully identify all the pigments your research suggested would be present in Chlorella vulgaris? Were there some that you did not extract? Why might this be?
Using the retention factor information from the algae, the terrestrial plant leaf, and a flower petal, are there any similar pigments? Why do you think that is?
CER Rubric
Check your work! |
||
Claim – a conclusion that answers the original question |
|
|
Evidence – scientific data that supports the claim |
|
|
Reasoning – a justification that links the claim and evidence |
|
|
Page -
[1] Adaptation of Divinyl Chlorophyll a/b-Containing Cyanobacterium to Different Light Conditions: Three Strains of Prochlorococcus marinus
Fumiya Hamada, Akio Murakami, and Seiji Akimoto
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2017 121 (39), 9081-9090
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b04835